Dorothy Parker articulated the sentiment of many writers when she said, “I hate writing; I love having written.” This is probably the case for practitioners of many disciplines, loving the end result if not so much the process. The problem, however, is when that perspective keeps us from ever really beginning. This, tragically, is the case for far too many. They live with the idea of having done something, but never gain enough self-discipline, know-how, creativity, or whatever, to ever get to the finished product and, thus, fuel the next.
I
think this is the case for many church leaders and Christians when it comes to
making other disciples. They love the idea
of Jesus’ Great Commission (Mt. 28:16-20), but lack the discipline, know-how,
creativity, or whatever, to actually engage in intentional disciple-making.
It’s a cliché to point to consumerism as the culprit, but it seems there is
something of a consumerist current underlying this lack of perpetuating
disciple-makers.
Consuming Discipleship
Most
folks who are really hungry to learn about life as a disciple just move from
study to study, program to program, even mission project to mission project—all
good things—without ever getting to the “go and do likewise” phase. (By which I
mean go and gather a new group of people and lead them in study and mission,
but also in starting their own group, etc., etc.)
One
typically unspoken aspect of this consumerism is the leaders’ desire always to
have these hungry people under their leadership. If we teach them to leave our
teaching and to go and lead others, will we ever get another good group of
eager students or team members? We want our “favorites” there for our next
study or project. Who wouldn’t!
But
the other, more obvious, side is that we just leave out the instruction and
facilitation for the next, crucial step—gathering and leading a new team, for
the sake of releasing most of them eventually to gather and lead and release,
etc. We go from Point A (get disciples
together) to Point B (teach/lead them) and then back to Point A, almost always
with the same group. We never get to Point C (teach them to teach and lead) and
Point D (release them to their own Point A and facilitate as needed).
Two
things seem especially needful here: 1) Cultivate a culture, not just of
discipleship, but of disciple-making. It could also be stated that we just need
a more accurate definition of discipleship that includes perpetuation. And, 2)
Instruction for Points C and D. This order is likely reversed, so that as
disciples go through studies and projects and also instruction for gathering and leading others, as well as the
blessing and support of their leadership, then the culture (#1) gets created.
In
the end, whether someone actually likes the process of making another disciple,
or they just like the end result (though there never really is an end) of
having made another disciple-making disciple, they never have to settle for
merely liking the idea of making
disciples. Their life, their church, and their little corner of the world
begins to become a library, with one living book after another that they are
helping to write.
2 comments:
Very good stuff, Mr. Pelfrey.
Thanks, Jeff! Blessings on your own disciple-making work.
Post a Comment